STER
New Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by STER on Sept 10, 2004 8:35:39 GMT -5
i draged a VL HOLDEN fully worked pod, headers, ecu, you name it 3.0 L no turbo and i beat him pritty much stock!!!!! ster
|
|
|
Post by rye on Sept 10, 2004 10:12:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by manditrd on Sept 10, 2004 19:45:50 GMT -5
Nice nice! Good to see you're keeping the Commo's back in their place....... Behind us!!!
|
|
|
Post by Turismo2029 on Sept 13, 2004 21:07:17 GMT -5
The Commodores driver must have been hopeless then. The VLs came out with the Nissan RB20 motor in them, and it would have beat you if you were stock. I know how good the VLs are because my friend has one, and hes flogged a number of cars in drags, including 4th gen celicas. I'm not picking on Celicas, just the driver of that VL.
|
|
STER
New Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by STER on Sept 16, 2004 8:45:37 GMT -5
no no no you r very wrong my friend....... if you dont be leave me beleve the figures..... the 4gen does 0-100 in 8.1 sec (stock) the VL (man) does (no turbo) 0-100 in 9.7 (stock) and 11.7 with the auto (and he had the auto) here is a respected holden site and read 4 your self www.deakin.edu.au/~jpiec/vl.html there is an offcieal website but i forgot the link and there it sez that the auto does it in 11 sec i do alot of reserch on my oppents plus the driver was ok now, you cant tell me that he was a bad driver!!!!!
|
|
berad
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by berad on Feb 11, 2005 2:39:48 GMT -5
the vl had a rb30 in it... not rb 20 and there slow as piss if u know how to drive u will beat them u can beat vn's to if u can drive
|
|
|
Post by NZcelica on Feb 12, 2005 0:53:18 GMT -5
ba fuk those RB30's are slow but no where NEAR as bad as the 2L berlina jobs that they (for some weird reason) put in VLs and VNs
|
|
|
Post by manditrd on Feb 16, 2005 4:24:12 GMT -5
The Commodores driver must have been hopeless then. The VLs came out with the Nissan RB20 motor in them, and it would have beat you if you were stock. I know how good the VLs are because my friend has one, and hes flogged a number of cars in drags, including 4th gen celicas. I'm not picking on Celicas, just the driver of that VL. Sluggish motor compared to ours off the line.... plus they are ugly as shit...
|
|
|
Post by chris88st on Mar 23, 2005 6:41:37 GMT -5
:-/now try your lucj against a nissan silvia s13 turbo my brothers kiked my ass
|
|
|
Post by chris88st on Mar 23, 2005 6:42:31 GMT -5
:-/now try your luck against a nissan silvia s13 turbo my brothers kiked my ass
|
|
|
Post by manditrd on Mar 30, 2005 5:15:32 GMT -5
:-/now try your luck against a nissan silvia s13 turbo my brothers kiked my ass Sure, I have no problems racing a turbo silvia... considering I own a Nissan 180sx (called the 240sx in america) which is also turbo... lol did I forgot to mention I bought a new car??
|
|
|
Post by ToyGTR on Mar 30, 2005 6:40:33 GMT -5
Wow shes back! Nice car, i like them 180's ;D CA18DET or SR20DET?
|
|
|
Post by manditrd on Apr 21, 2005 22:05:26 GMT -5
ahaha yep, on a public computer cos mine is fucked!! so no surfing for me!! But yea only a ca18det but its zippy as shit... dont worry though magor engine upgrades coming down the track... got wheel spin in the wet at the lights the other day in 4th,.... sick!!
|
|
|
Post by Turismo2029 on May 23, 2005 17:22:03 GMT -5
True about the VL's being ugly. 4th Gen Celica > VL.
I looked more into it and found most the VL's Ive seen, aswell as my mates were done up, not stock, so yeah.
Did you keep your Celica or not Mandi?
|
|
|
Post by manditrd on Jul 17, 2005 2:38:45 GMT -5
Yea I still have the celica I have her up for sale, If I didnt have a loan out on the 180sx believe me I would keep the celica... but this way the big girl will be driven heaps more than I can
|
|